Quantum field theory overestimated the value of dark energy by 120 orders of magnitude—a prediction considered among the worst in the history of physics.

The theory suggests that dark energy permeates space and may drive the universe to expand or contract throughout its history. The model's flexibility allows it to fit every possible observed behavior of the universe's expansion, rendering it unfalsifiable and untestable.

Traditional physics breaks down at the moment of the Big Bang, but quantum theory suggests that “empty” space is never truly empty. In 1973, physicist Edward Tryon proposed that our universe began from a quantum energy blip in the quantum vacuum.

The discovery, which came from analyzing extensive data from a major cosmological survey, challenges the assumed constancy of dark energy in modern physics. Understanding dark energy's behavior is crucial for predicting the universe's long-term evolution.

The Hubble tension refers to mismatches in the calculated rate of expansion of the universe derived from different methods, such as supernova data and the cosmic microwave background. By allowing dark energy to become active at a different time, models of the universe on which some of these methods depend are revised, altering the calculated values.

The Lambda cold dark matter model uses the Greek letter to denote the presence of a cosmological constant version of dark energy, alongside slow-moving dark matter and ordinary visible matter. It can account for the observed distribution of galaxies, the structure of the cosmic microwave background, the acceleration of the universe, and the abundance of hydrogen.

As the universe expanded after the Big Bang, matter and energy diluted at different rates, with light once the most dense substance in the cosmos, followed by a period when matter was the most dense component. About five billion years ago, the density of dark energy was higher than that of both light and matter, which will continue to dilute.

What is dark energy? What is dark matter? Well, if we knew exactly, we would have a Nobel prize—we know that they exist, though. Scientists have theorized that the former may be a property of three-dimensional space itself, while the latter could be exotic particles that interact with almost nothing. This video from Kurzgesagt explains what we know and what we don't.

Combining the general theory of relativity with quantum field theory creates nonsensical mathematical outcomes, such as probabilities of infinity. These are resolved by treating particles as vibrating strings rather than points of matter. However, probing the scale of these strings to validate the theory requires technology equivalent to a particle accelerator the size of the solar system.

If the density of dark energy, which produces a repulsive effect through the expansion of space, increases with time, then all structures of matter, including galaxies, stars, planets, and atoms, will be pulled apart once the strength of dark energy surpasses the magnitude of the forces holding those structures together, including the gravitational and electromagnetic forces.

While the sun is expected to continue shining for another five billion years, the expansion of the universe will cause nearby stars and galaxies to become ever more distant, until they are too far to observe. Once the last old, red, dim stars cool into darkness after trillions of years, the universe will settle into a state of eternal, dark emptiness.

Scientists using the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI) analyzed light from 15 million galaxies and quasars to identify that the universe's accelerated expansion is diminishing. If this continues, the universe might reverse course and collapse in as little as 20 billion years.

Because quantum mechanics prevents systems from ever reaching an energy value of zero, a seemingly empty vacuum of space still contains some amount of energy associated with its lowest allowed state. Since descending to even lower states is forbidden, extracting meaningful amounts of energy from an empty vacuum is impossible.

Dark matter holds galaxies and other large-scale structures together through gravity, and dark energy drives the universe's accelerating expansion. While scientists do not know what either is made of, they see how these dark components affect the normal matter in the universe.

When scientists first tried calculating the radiation emitted by a heated object, their assumption was that energy was equally distributed across wavelengths and produced infinite energy at low wavelengths. This contradicted observations, which showed near-zero energy intensity at those values.

General relativity predicted that the gravity of all the matter in the universe would cause it to collapse, contradicting the belief at the time that the universe was constant and unchanging. Albert Einstein added the cosmological constant to his equations, which acted like anti-gravity, to "fix" his math.

The former resulted from analyzing the motion of galaxies in the Coma Cluster, a subset of the approximately 30,000 galaxies he cataloged during his life. When hypothesizing an origin for observed high-energy particles called cosmic rays, Zwicky and colleague Walter Baade thought they could come from exploding stars, or supernovae—a term he coined—which would leave behind a collapsed star made entirely of neutrons.

As gravity tried to bring matter closer together in the early universe, its high temperature produced an outward pressure that caused it to expand. These competing forces caused matter to vibrate and produce the equivalent of sound waves, which spread outward as the universe expanded and cooled, serving as relics of dark energy's history.

Rewinding the universe to the big bang compresses all matter, energy, space, and time into a single point, necessitating a model that combines general relativity with quantum mechanics. Although physicists understand time to have begun when the universe did, a clear understanding of the mechanisms involved remains unclear.

One of the most surprising discoveries about our universe over the past century is that it's expanding. Even more surprising is that it’s speeding up, and scientists aren’t entirely sure why. The rate should be roughly dependent on the total energy contained in the universe, but calculations keep coming up short. Explore the so-called “Hubble Tension,” along with potential candidates to solve the riddle.

Using the framework of quantum field theory, it structures all known particles into 12 matter particles, alongside five particles that carry three of the four fundamental forces. Although remarkably precise and predictive, it cannot yet explain gravity, dark matter, or dark energy.

Among the issues with the most successful theory of the universe at subatomic scales is its inability to explain the extreme imbalance observed between visible matter and antimatter, since both should be roughly equal. The Standard Model also omits gravity and cannot account for the observed rate of cosmic expansion.

Using data from the cosmic microwave background, which allows astronomers to model the universe's conditions since its earliest moments, yields a rate of expansion—the Hubble constant—lower than values obtained from multiple techniques measured locally at more recent timescales. Reconciling the discrepancy, known as the Hubble tension, will require a third independent measurement method between the two scales

The Wheeler-DeWitt equation, a modified version of the Schödinger equation—the formula that describes the evolution of the quantum configuration of a system—describes the quantum state of space-time across the universe. The transformation causes the variable of time to disappear, suggesting it is not a fundamental, physical parameter of the cosmos.

This interactive concisely describes many highly complex theories ranging from quantum gravity and black holes to dark matter and energy. Supplementary resources, key questions, and possible solutions accompany each description. As of 2026, no developed theory provides an accepted explanation of all observed phenomena in the universe at all scales.

Research shows that while universes with slightly weaker dark energy form stars more efficiently, universes with stronger dark energy are statistically more common and can still support star formation. This challenges the anthropic logic that our universe must have ideal conditions for life because we exist to observe them.