Politics

Featured Topics

    1440 Findings

    Hours of research by our editors, distilled into minutes of clarity.

    • Why Supreme Court confirmations have become so bitter

      In recent decades, Supreme Court nominations have grown increasingly contentious and partisan. This video examines the historical shift from once bipartisan and civil confirmation hearings to the deeply divisive process seen today. It focuses on the 1987 nomination of Robert Bork, the most recent nominee to be rejected, as an important moment in this transformation.

    • What was Marbury v. Madison about?

      ​Marbury v. Madison (1803) was a landmark US Supreme Court case that established the principle of judicial review. This concept empowers American courts to invalidate laws and statutes that violate the Constitution. This decision significantly increased the influence and authority of the Supreme Court. This video from the History Channel outlines the case and its impact on American constitutional law.

      Video

      What was Marbury v. Madison about?

    • What was the 'Dred Scott' decision?

      ​The Dred Scott decision was a landmark 1857 US Supreme Court case that denied African Americans citizenship and upheld the legality of slavery. This page from Encyclopedia Britannica explores the case, providing information on Dred Scott and his case before the Supreme Court. Explore the implications of one of the most important cases in the history of the court.

    • Explore the cases of the Supreme Court

      Discover the National Constitution Center’s collection of landmark Supreme Court cases that shaped US history. Browse by constitutional topic to explore key rulings, their historical impact, and the legal principles they established. Each case includes a summary of the decision, along with notable excerpts from majority and dissenting opinions. Deepen your understanding of how these rulings continue to influence American law and society.

    • Watch two Supreme Court justices debate how the Constitution should be interpreted

      In a 2009 conversation, former Justices Antonin Scalia and Stephen G. Breyer lay out competing approaches to constitutional interpretation—Scalia’s textualist, strict constructionism versus Breyer’s evolutionary view of the Constitution in practice.

      Video

      U.S. Supreme Court Justices Antonin Scalia & Stephen Breyer Conversation on the Constitution (2009)

    • Why Supreme Court justices serve for life

      While most government leaders have limits to how long they can lead, the United States Supreme Court is a rare exception. The US Constitution established life terms for the country's highest judges, ostensibly to insulate the institution from political pressures associated with campaigning or as a quid pro quo for a brief appointment. Dive into the debate around this controversial US policy with this brief write-up.

    Next page