The prospect of revisiting the past or jumping to the future has captured people's imaginations for centuries. Our contemporary understanding of time travel is a marriage of theoretical physics and science fiction.
Hours of research by our editors, distilled into minutes of clarity.
When renowned theoretical physicist Stephen Hawking did not rule out the possibility of time travel in his posthumous book Brief Answers to the Big Questions, many hopefuls got excited. But, unfortunately for them, Hawking believed that yet-to-be discovered laws of physics will prove time travel impossible. This piece outlines some practicalities about the speed of light and wormholes that lend way to Hawking’s prediction.
If you went back in time and killed your grandfather when he was a child, what would happen to you? One of your parents would never be born, so you wouldn’t be born either. But, if you’re never born, how could you kill your grandfather in the first place? This so-called grandfather paradox is something physicists, philosophers and sci-fi writers constantly ponder. Read the piece to learn how they’ve been trying to reconcile it.
The grandfather paradox doesn’t exist, according to research out of the University of Queensland in Brisbane, Australia in 2020. They ran some models to determine that, if one traveled back in time and made changes to the past, those changes couldn’t dramatically alter the present. The original outcome that propelled the time traveler to visit the past would still find a way to happen. If true, would this make time travel less intriguing? Less scary and more attractive?
In 2009, Hawking hosted a reception but only sent out invitations afterward, hoping that time travelers from the future would attend and prove time travel possible. He later joked it was "experimental evidence" that time travel doesn’t exist.
The laws of physics, as currently understood, don’t categorically reject the possibility of time travel. But, scientists are skeptical, especially when it comes to traveling to the past. Hopping between past, present and future would require the world to have some wacky yet-to-be-discovered physical properties like negative mass, negative energy, and infinite density. Time travel also introduces philosophical questions about free will, causality, and chronology.
According to quantum physics, traveling back in time to kill one's grandfather would not cause a paradox because time travel would bring one to a new timeline, where the person killed is not one's grandfather. Alternatively, causality would not be violated because the universe would prevent the murder from occurring.
The equations of special relativity require these objects to possess imaginary mass, and they would travel faster the more energy is taken away from them. The existence of tachyons would necessitate an unknown form of matter and lead to paradoxes involving information that can hypothetically travel backward in time.
Humans have been captivated by the prospect of leaping forward and backward in time for thousands of years. Georgia Institute of Technology Science Fiction Studies Professor Lisa Yaszek recounts how the concept has been utilized by storytellers from 400 BCE to modern-day to explore our relationship with the supernatural, technology, and the past. In a way, this historical recounting is a journey through time.
Time travel has fascinated humans for centuries. It appears in myths, literature, and science fiction. One of the earliest examples comes from the 400 BCE Hindu epic Mahabharata, describing time dilation long before Einstein’s Theory of Relativity. By the 19th century, stories introduced machines enabling time travel—setting the stage for modern sci-fi.
These hypothetical distortions in the fabric of spacetime may connect vast distances across or even between universes. While science fiction often portrays them as traversable tunnels, the energy and matter required to keep a wormhole open defy current physical understanding.
